Legal Opinion

Nechman v. Supplee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1926No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Defendant Supplee appeals from a decree of the Wayne county circuit court, in chancery, permanently enjoining him from violating certain building restrictions imposed on Harry A. Bell’s Fern-dale Gardens subdivision of lot 4 and part of lot 5 of the subdivision of lot 9 of the Shipyard tract in town 2 south, of range 11 east, located in the southwesterly part of the city of Detroit. • The restrictions were embodied both in the officially approved and recorded plat of said subdivision and in contracts and deeds given purchasers of lots.

Lot 28 of this subdivision, in regard to which violation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Nechman v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. SzczesiakCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
  2. Hollingsworth v. SzczesiakCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
  3. Maganini v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. J. William Winney, Jr. v. Michael Troy JerupWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Cooke v. TaubeMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API