Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bogstrand

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 3, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The purpose of the present application by an attorney who was employed in the probating of the will in the present case is to obtain compensation for his services in that regard. The petitioner on the probate was a brother of the testator. By the terms of the will he received no beneficial interest thereunder, as the entire estate was bequeathed to a non-resident alien domiciled in Norway. After the probate had been effected, yarioüs proceedings were had for the appointment of an administrator c. t. a. by reason of the fact that the named executor was a Norwegian corporation and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of TracyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brissie v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Sussman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  3. In re the Estate of SeppalaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of LautenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API