Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1938No. 31,640PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Defendant was convicted of grand larceny in the second degree in the district court of Martin county. He appeals from the judgment of conviction.

The information charged defendant with stealing 40 buff Orpington chickens of the value of $32 from one J. W. Craven. At the trial, the state, in order to procure a conviction, offered the testimony of two accomplices, Charles Scott, age 16 years and Guy Scott, age 20 years, nephews of defendant. The only question presented on the appeal has to do with whether there is any evidence tending to convict defendant of the offense…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . O'FarrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. State v. BoltonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. State v. GillumIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API