Legal Opinion
Sequeira v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 15, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-2095Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEITH P. SEQUEIRA, HELEN D. SEQUEIRA, Plaintiffs, Case No. 23-cv-2095 (CRC) v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP. as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, N.A. Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Keith and Helen Sequeira, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, sued the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver for Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu”). The Sequeiras allege that WaMu engaged in illegal lending practices when negotiating the couples’ 2004 home mortgage loan, in violation of the Real Estate Settlement and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Brown v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.