Legal Opinion
Klein v. Morris Plan Industrial Bank
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 4, 1942No. 65PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*810CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The question presented on this appeal is whether the referee and the district court committed error in denying a discharge to the bankrupt for failure to keep books showing the extensive gambling transactions which led to his bankruptcy. In his original petition the bankrupt stated that the sum of $15,000 had been lost by him as a result of gambling during the previous year, but that “particulars and dates cannot be given since the gambling was daily and involved thousands of transactions.” In 1933, he received his discharge in a bankruptcy due to the same cause. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re UnderhillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- White v. SchoenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Karger v. SandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Watts v. MalatestaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Bamman v. EricksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Burchett v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Morris Plan Industrial Bank of New York v. SchornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Morris Plan Industrial Bank of New York v. DreherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- In the Matter of Arthur J. Halpern, Bankrupt-Appellee. Chase Manhattan Bank, Objectant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- In Re McNayDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.