Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Monsanto Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 30, 2023No. 2:16-cv-00107Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 CITY OF SEATTLE, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C16-107-RAJ-MLP 10 v. ORDER 11 MONSANTO COMPANY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff City of Seattle’s (“City”) “Motion to Exclude 16 Proposed Expert Testimony by Marc Rogoff” (“City’s Motion”). (Pl.’s Mot. (dkt. # 601).) Under 17 Federal Rule of Evidence 702, the City seeks to exclude the testimony of Defendants Monsanto 18 Company, Solutia Inc., and Pharmacia LLC’s (“Defendants” or “Monsanto”) waste and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Charlotte KENNEDY and Robert Kennedy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLLAGEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API