Legal Opinion

State v. Flynn

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1999No. 97-614PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Raymond X. Flynn, appeals his convictions of burglary, see RSA 635:1, I (1996), and theft, see RSA 637:3 (1996), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Perkins, J.). He asserts that the State failed to introduce sufficient evidence that: (1) he was not licensed or privileged to enter the burglarized *568premises; and (2) he lacked license or permission to carry away the property of another. We affirm.

At trial, the State presented the following evidence. On September 21, 1996, at the Mount Washington Hotel, the manager and a bellman were conducting a routine security check. They…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jingles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. State v. BlowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DugasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. State v. RuffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Karen FolleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API