State v. Ruff
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The defendant, Wendy Ruff, appeals her conviction for criminal trespass, RSA 635:2 (Supp. 2006), following a jury trial in Superior Court {McGuire, J.) challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.
The jury could have found the following facts based upon the evidence presented. Benita Flanders, the defendant’s mother-in-law, has resided at 258 North Village Road in Warner since 1992. Her son, Arthur, along with his wife and daughter, lives at the same residence. The defendant is married to another of Benita’s sons. The defendant and Benita have had an acrimonious relationship for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. GaffneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. BalukasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SilvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- In re Guardianship of B.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022
- State of New Hampshire v. Justin GunnipSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022
- State of New Hampshire v. Justin ParrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022