Hendrix v. Daugherty
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell
I
In this appeal of a judgment in a legal malpractice action, we consider whether the original and amended motions for judgment contain allegations of proximate causation sufficient to state a cause of action.
The plaintiffs, Thomas E. Hendrix and Mattie D. (Hendrix) Forbes, filed a motion for judgment against their former attorneys, Guy E. Daugherty, Thomas J. Gallo, and the law firm of Howell, Daugherty, Brown & Lawrence. The plaintiffs alleged in their motion for judgment that the defendant attorneys negligently prosecuted a tort action on behalf of the plaintiffs.
The defendant attorneys had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allied Productions, Inc. v. DuesterdickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Dodson v. Potomac MacK Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Campbell v. BettiusSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Duvall, Blackburn, Hale & Downey v. SiddiquiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dammarell v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Brown v. SlenkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Campbell v. HarmonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Jones v. Prince George's County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Centra Health, Inc. v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.