Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. Daugherty

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 21, 1995No. Record 941063PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

I

In this appeal of a judgment in a legal malpractice action, we consider whether the original and amended motions for judgment contain allegations of proximate causation sufficient to state a cause of action.

The plaintiffs, Thomas E. Hendrix and Mattie D. (Hendrix) Forbes, filed a motion for judgment against their former attorneys, Guy E. Daugherty, Thomas J. Gallo, and the law firm of Howell, Daugherty, Brown & Lawrence. The plaintiffs alleged in their motion for judgment that the defendant attorneys negligently prosecuted a tort action on behalf of the plaintiffs.

The defendant attorneys had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allied Productions, Inc. v. DuesterdickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  2. Dodson v. Potomac MacK Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  3. Campbell v. BettiusSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  4. Duvall, Blackburn, Hale & Downey v. SiddiquiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Dammarell v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  2. Brown v. SlenkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Campbell v. HarmonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. Jones v. Prince George's County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
  5. Centra Health, Inc. v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API