United States v. John Broers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The defendant, John Broers, was found guilty of selling his services as a hunting guide in a national forest without a permit, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.10(c), a regulation promulgated pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 (1982) (rules protecting national forests). At Broers’ trial before a magistrate, the government was represented by a Special Agent of the United States Forest Service who was not an attorney. Broers argues that prosecution by a non-attorney violated his due process rights because it necessarily implicated the impartiality of the magistrate, who, Broers contends, improperly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gregorio Figueroa Ruiz v. Gerardo Delgado, WardenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- United States v. JamesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
- United States v. GloverDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. DowninDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995