Legal Opinion

United States v. John Broers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 21, 1985No. 85-3036PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant, John Broers, was found guilty of selling his services as a hunting guide in a national forest without a permit, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.10(c), a regulation promulgated pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 (1982) (rules protecting national forests). At Broers’ trial before a magistrate, the government was represented by a Special Agent of the United States Forest Service who was not an attorney. Broers argues that prosecution by a non-attorney violated his due process rights because it necessarily implicated the impartiality of the magistrate, who, Broers contends, improperly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gregorio Figueroa Ruiz v. Gerardo Delgado, WardenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. JamesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
  3. United States v. GloverDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. DowninDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API