Legal Opinion
Mora v. Black Horse Capital Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 21, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00017Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 NATASHA MORA, Case No.: 3:25-cv-00017-RBM-AHG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING EX PARTE 12 v. APPLICATION TO RESCIND POSTJUDGMENT LOCKOUT 13 BLACK HORSE CAPITAL INC., et al., 14 Defendants. [Doc. 6] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Natasha Mora’s (“Plaintiff”) Ex Parte 22 Application to Rescind Post Judgment Lockout against Defendant San Diego Sheriff’s 23 Department and Defendant Sheriff Kelly A. Martinez (the “Sheriff Defendants” or the 24 “Sheriff”)1 (the “Ex Parte Application”). (Doc.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.