Legal Opinion

Hertz v. Hertz

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County

Decided May 25, 2000No. 01738 N 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

ENDY, S.J.,

In the matter at bar, we are asked to determine the post-reconciliation enforceability of an agreement reached through mediation and captioned as a “memorandum of understanding.” Because we find the self-styled “memorandum of understanding” to be a valid, comprehensive property settlement agreement rather than a mere separation agreement, it is enforceable against the plaintiff, notwithstanding the parties’ interim reconciliation prior to final separation.

Margaret and Cyril Hertz married on June 4, 1988. They have two children, Alexander, bom May 30,1990, and Cody, born May 2,1993.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Fish v. BehersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. DiValerio v. DiValerioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Wolfe v. WolfeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Wareham ex rel. Trout v. WarehamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API