Legal Opinion

Ballin v. Fourteenth Street Store

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

■ Appeal by the defendant, The Fourteenth Street Store, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 21st day of June, 1907, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Trial Term, a jury having been waived.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, J.:

This is an action for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff had the judgment, and the defendant appeals. The defendant claims that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover in any event ■ or under any circumstances, because his conduct leading up to the delivery of the goods was dishonest, fraudulent and against public policy. The facts "are somewhat unusual, ■and reflect one phase of an unfortunate condition which is. all too prevalent in the business world, namely, the .bribing by wholesale dealers of purchasing agents of prospective customers.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sirkin v. Fourteenth Street StoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Jaclyn, Inc. v. Edison Brothers Stores, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Babcock v. Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Hearn v. SchuchmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API