Legal Opinion

People v. Cordova

California Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1939No. Crim. 4220PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1239 of the Penal Code there is here automatically presented an appeal by defendant from a judgment of conviction imposing the extreme penalty.

Accused by information of having murdered his three-year-old son, defendant entered the dual pleas of “not guilty” and “not guilty by reason of insanity”. After jury trial on the main plea he was found guilty as charged, and the degree of crime was fixed as murder of the first degree. Trial was then had on the plea of insanity, and the jury returned a verdict finding that defendant was sane at the time of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. TrocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. State v. LambSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. People v. CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API