Legal Opinion

Young Women's Christian Association v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1956No. 35959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

1. The defendant demurred to the following portion of the petition as being a conclusion of the pleader and unsupported by pleaded facts: “and the aforesaid wax and polish was transparent and invisible and petitioner was therefore unable to observe same.” Assuming but not deciding that the allegation “and petitioner' was therefore unable to observe same” is a conclusion of the pleader, the allegation “and the aforesaid wax and polish was transparent and invisible” was an allegation of fact, and the ground of demurrer is therefore without merit.

2. The defendant demurred to the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pilgreen v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Mason v. FrankelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Woolworth Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Mattox v. LambrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. MacOn Academy Music Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. AMERICAN LEGION &C. v. SimontonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Kaminsky v. BlackshearCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Rockmart Bank v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Kaminsky v. BlackshearCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API