Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Nance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1991No. E007995Published

1Concurrence

TIMLIN, J., Concurring.

I concur with the majority’s affirmance of the judgment entered below—and I do so in agreement with the majority’s conclusion that defendant failed, under any evidentiary burden of proof standard, to establish good cause to be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea/admission pursuant to section 1018 of the Penal Code.1 However, I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s rather cursory conclusion concerning the evidentiary burden of proof issue raised by defendant in this case. Unlike the majority, I agree with defendant that the “preponderance of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API