People v. Nance
California Court of Appeal
1Concurrence
TIMLIN, J., Concurring.
I concur with the majority’s affirmance of the judgment entered below—and I do so in agreement with the majority’s conclusion that defendant failed, under any evidentiary burden of proof standard, to establish good cause to be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea/admission pursuant to section 1018 of the Penal Code.1 However, I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s rather cursory conclusion concerning the evidentiary burden of proof issue raised by defendant in this case. Unlike the majority, I agree with defendant that the “preponderance of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.