Legal Opinion

Rocky Ford Housing Authority v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 18, 1977No. Civ. A. 76-495PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and on cross-motions for summary judgment. The ease arises out of the refusal of the Secretary of Agriculture to implement the “rural rent supplement program” created by section 514 1 of Title V of the omnibus Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 [the 1974 Act]. If implemented, this program would make rental housing available to low-income families in rural areas at a rate not to exceed. 25 per cent of income. See H.R.Rep. No. 93-1114, 93d Cong., 2d Sess.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. L.J. Garner and Tommie N. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Allen v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. GarnerDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1983
  5. Massoud v. Attorney General of the United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API