Legal Opinion
Bilak v. Colvin
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 15, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-05956 (SDW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIGENTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before this Court by way of two motions pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (“EAJA”): (1) Plaintiff Lisa Jill Bilak’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Attorney’s Fees for Rutgers Urban Legal Clinic (“Rutgers”), Plaintiffs counsel before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (“Third Circuit”), and (2) Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees for Agnes D. Wladyka (“Wlady-ka”), Plaintiffs counsel before this Court. (Dkt. No. 25, 33.) Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beattie v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- KELLEHER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- RAY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019