Legal Opinion

RAY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 6, 2019No. 2:15-cv-03285Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION CLOSING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANTHONY ANDREW RAY Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-3285 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, OPINION Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ARLEO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff Anthony Andrew Ray’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). ECF No. 16. The Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) opposes the Motion. ECF No. 19. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, the Motion is DENIED.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Hanover Potato Products, Inc. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Williams v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API