Legal Opinion

Parks v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Punitive damages are not recoverable in an action against an insurance company based upon a claim of wrongful and bad-faith refusal to pay under the terms of a policy of fire insurance. Allegations of breach of an insurance contract, even a breach committed willfully and without justification, are insufficient to authorize such recovery {TJniland Dev. Co. v Home Ins. Co., 97 AD2d 973; Reifenstein v Allstate Ins. Co., 92 AD2d 715). Since plaintiffs’ action is grounded upon private…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Halpin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Reifenstein v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. LTS Contractors, Inc. v. Hartford InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Uniland Development Co. v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Service America Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  2. Ditch v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API