Armstrong v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary. Code 1923, §3479.
It was alleged in the indictment under which he was tried that the building burglarized was that of “Robert Jackson.” Code 1923, § 4556, form 27.
Nowhere in the testimony given on the trial does the name of “Robert Jackson” appear'; rather, the person whose building was the subject of the burglary is described in said testimony only as “R. P. Jackson.”
It may be, as the learned Mr. Justice Gardner remarked of a question similar to that here apparent, i. e. whether or not there was a variance between the allegations in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Pearson v. DarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Ex Parte ShoultsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Lincoln Mills v. Textile Workers Union, CIO, Local No. 230Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972