Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Ford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1925PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Habt, J.,

(after stating the facts). The appeal in this case involves the construction to be given to §§ If and 12 of the acts of 1913, and § 2 of the special Acts of 1913 above referred to.

So much of § 11 as is necessary to a decision of the case reads as follows:

“Section 11. The board of commissioners shall, at the first regular meeting after the election of its members, or as soon as practicable thereafter, appoint by a majority vote a city clerk and attorney or attorneys for the city, a city engineer, chief of police, city physician, chief of fire department and such, other officers and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Little Rock v. North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Booe v. Road Improvement District No. 4Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Ark-Ash Lumber Co. v. Pride & FairleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Mondschein v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  5. L. R. & Ft. Smith Ry. Co. v. HannifordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Littleton v. BlantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Lemaire v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Cannon v. MaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Murphy v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. Street Improvement Districts Nos. 481 & 485 v. HadfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API