Legal Opinion
Cannon v. May
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 9, 1931PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.
It is conceded by counsel for the parties that the single question raised by this appeal is the validity of act 150 of the Acts of 1929, placing the county treasurer and county and probate clerk of Hempstead County, Arkansas, on a salary basis. Acts of 1929, vol. 1, p. 764.
That part of § 1 relating to the issue raised by the appeal provides that the county and probate clerk of Hempstead County, Arkansas, shall receive as full compensation for his services as county and probate clerk the sum of $3,600, and the sum of $1,500 for a deputy, said sums to be paid in equal monthly installments. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Webb v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Harwood v. WentworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ferguson v. . RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Waterman v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Greene County v. LydySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mears v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Littleton v. BlantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Buzbee v. HuttonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Shaw v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Dozier v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.