Legal Opinion
Todd v. Oppenheimer & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1978No. 77 Civ. 3058-CSHPublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
The defendants Oppenheimer & Company, Inc. (“Oppenheimer”) and Fields have moved: a) to dismiss certain portions of the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b) for failing to allege fraud with particularity; b) to stay any judicial determination of that portion of the complaint not based on federal securities laws, pursuant to Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3; and c) to stay the above-mentioned arbitration pending this Court’s resolution of the federal securities law claims. Plaintiffs opposed the first two motions.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Robert J. Guidry v. Bank of Laplace, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- O'BRIEN v. National Property Analysts PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Conan Properties, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.