Legal Opinion
Fast Food Systems, Inc. v. Ducotey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 15, 1992No. 71390PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, Justice.
FACTS
Appellant, Fast Food Systems, obtained a money judgment for $11,000.00 against Howard Ducotey, which is now final. Du-cotey is not a party to this appeal.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On June 3, 1987, the trial court held a hearing on assets. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court “prohibited and restrained” Ducotey from “disposing of any income tax refunds, state or federal, after the 3rd day of June 1987 until further order of the Court.” On the same day, Fast Food, as judgment creditor, caused the court clerk to issue a garnishee summons against appellant, First State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pracht v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Culie v. ArnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Barton v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Russell v. Maxson Sales Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Zucker v. United States Computer Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- McMahan & Company v. Po Folks, Inc., Traditional Bank, Incorporated F/k/a Montgomery Traders Bank & Trust Company, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Pflueger v. Effective Secretarial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- McMahan & Co v. Po Folks IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000