Legal Opinion

Ripley v. Mercier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 12, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

Plaintiffs Harry and Ruth Ripley appeal from an order of dismissal by the Superior Court, York County, under M.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), of their action on a promissory note. Because we hold that their complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted, we vacate the order of dismissal and remand for trial.

A complaint is sufficient to withstand a Rule 12(b)(6) motion if it avers facts that would entitle a plaintiff to relief upon some theory or if it asserts every necessary element of a claim. Stanley v. Schiavi Mobile Homes, Inc., 462 A.2d 1144, 1147 (Me.1983). The court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Schiavi Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. MacKerron v. MaduraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Blake v. SamuelsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Francis v. StinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Bandon AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API