Ripley v. Mercier
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
SCOLNIK, Justice.
Plaintiffs Harry and Ruth Ripley appeal from an order of dismissal by the Superior Court, York County, under M.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), of their action on a promissory note. Because we hold that their complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted, we vacate the order of dismissal and remand for trial.
A complaint is sufficient to withstand a Rule 12(b)(6) motion if it avers facts that would entitle a plaintiff to relief upon some theory or if it asserts every necessary element of a claim. Stanley v. Schiavi Mobile Homes, Inc., 462 A.2d 1144, 1147 (Me.1983). The court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stanley v. Schiavi Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- MacKerron v. MaduraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Blake v. SamuelsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by2 opinions
- Francis v. StinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Bandon AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1991