Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Stumpp

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 28, 1986PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Since a police officer is permitted to inspect premises selling liquor for on-premises consumption and since such inspection includes the right to inspect books and records, the defendant was properly convicted of obstructing governmental administration for refusing access to his books and records (see, Penal *4Law § 195.05; Alcoholic Beverage Control Law §§ 106, 130; Matter of Barski v State Liq. Auth., 285 App Div 996).

Di Paola, P. J., Slifkin and Widlitz, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barski v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. LupinacciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Shaheed v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Uzoukwu v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. People v. SimonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
  5. People v. JimenezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API