Legal Opinion

Norman v. Norman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1922No. 12719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The question now before this court is: Should the motion to dismiss the appeal be sustained or denied?

If the response is sufficient to raise an issue of fact, the motion should not be sustained until the issue of fact is determined. We do not think the response raises any issue, either of law or fact. The motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal is supported by her duly verified affidavit that the order of the court made on January 10, 1922, has not been complied with by the plaintiff in error. The plaintiff in error evades this issue by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spradling v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Tuttle v. TuttleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hall v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Brown v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moody v. MoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Sarber v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Scott v. TwyfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API