West v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cedar District Court. Action to recover for damages sustained by a fire alleged to bave been set out by the defendant in the operation of its road. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, C. J.
I. The court gave an instruction in these words: “You will determine from the evidence whether the defendant permitted such an accumulation of dry grass and weeds and other combustible matter within its right of way, exposed to ignition by their engines, as would be permitted or done by an ordinarily prudent man upon his own premises, if .exposed to the same hazard from fire as an accumulation of dry grass and weeds upon the right of way of the defendant. If you find that the defendant in this respect acted as an ordinarily careful and prudent man would have done under the same circumstances,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Small v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Kesee v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1870
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Matthews v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Bever v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Peter v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Sala v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.