Legal Opinion

Albert v. Gurelnick Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1948No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

On a scire.facias sur mechanic’s claim tried before the court without a jury there was judgment for the plaintiff and defendants appeal. ..

Plaintiff had a contract directly with the defendants, as owners, to make alterations and improvements in their dwelling house for $2,400.. The claim filed allowed defendants credit with $800 paid thereon, leaving a net claim of $1,600. The affidavit, of defense, inter alia, set up cash payments of $1,400 instead of $800. : The claim was filed April 17, the affidavit of defense on May 9, and the trial was on June 11, less than two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dyer v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Thirsk v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Murphy v. BearSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Kantor v. HerdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. May v. MoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aircraft Repair Services General Mediterranean Aviation Services v. Stambaugh's Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Shollenberger v. Rickman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API