Albert v. Gurelnick Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
On a scire.facias sur mechanic’s claim tried before the court without a jury there was judgment for the plaintiff and defendants appeal. ..
Plaintiff had a contract directly with the defendants, as owners, to make alterations and improvements in their dwelling house for $2,400.. The claim filed allowed defendants credit with $800 paid thereon, leaving a net claim of $1,600. The affidavit, of defense, inter alia, set up cash payments of $1,400 instead of $800. : The claim was filed April 17, the affidavit of defense on May 9, and the trial was on June 11, less than two…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dyer v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Thirsk v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Murphy v. BearSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Kantor v. HerdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- May v. MoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aircraft Repair Services General Mediterranean Aviation Services v. Stambaugh's Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Shollenberger v. Rickman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1950