Legal Opinion
Shollenberger v. Rickman
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Decided April 29, 1950No. 2Published
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, J.,
— Plaintiff architect has filed a mechanic’s lien, alleging there is $7,500 due under a contract in which he was to plan and supervise a building for defendant.
The contract appertaining to the work of plaintiff reads as follows:
“The Architect’s Services. — The Architect’s professional services consist of the necessary conferences, the preparation of preliminary studies, working drawings, specifications, large scale and full size detail drawings; the drafting of forms of proposals and contracts; the *45issuance of certificates of payment; the keeping of accounts, the general…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dyer v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Thirsk v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- May v. MoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Russell M. Howe, Inc. v. BeloffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Albert v. Gurelnick Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948