Legal Opinion

Shollenberger v. Rickman

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County

Decided April 29, 1950No. 2Published

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, J.,

— Plaintiff architect has filed a mechanic’s lien, alleging there is $7,500 due under a contract in which he was to plan and supervise a building for defendant.

The contract appertaining to the work of plaintiff reads as follows:

“The Architect’s Services. — The Architect’s professional services consist of the necessary conferences, the preparation of preliminary studies, working drawings, specifications, large scale and full size detail drawings; the drafting of forms of proposals and contracts; the *45issuance of certificates of payment; the keeping of accounts, the general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dyer v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Thirsk v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. May v. MoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Russell M. Howe, Inc. v. BeloffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Albert v. Gurelnick Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API