Legal Opinion

Queen v. Travelers Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 1972No. Nos. 71-752, 71-1058PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

These appeals have been consolidated for all appellate purposes. In the first numbered appeal Mabel E. Queen is the appellant and in the second numbered appeal Felix Huerta is the appellant. The appel-lee in each case is Travelers Insurance Company. The order appealed is the same and is an order striking from the final judgment the provision for the allowance of attorney’s fees. Each appellant claims a fee against the appellee under F.S. § 627.0127(1), F.S.A., which reads as follows :

“F.S. § 627.0127 Attorney fee—
“(1) Upon the rendition of a judgment or decree by any of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shingleton v. BusseySupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Beta Eta House Corp., Inc. of Tallahassee v. GregorySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Old Republic Insurance Co. v. MonseesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Ralph E. Coblentz, as Administrator D.B.N. Of the Estate of Edward Thomas Coblentz, Deceased v. American Surety Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Phoenix Insurance Company v. HeltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Wynn Ex Rel. Alabama v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999
  4. Roberts v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Travelers Insurance Co. v. QueenSupreme Court of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API