Legal Opinion

Frick Co. v. Rubel Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 9, 1932No. 5100Published

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the defendant to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action and that there is an existing final judgment of this court which is a bar to the maintenance 'of the present action, and upon the further ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

In this case diversity of citizenship is alleged in the complaint. The plaintiff seeks to recover $7,664.14, under a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant by the terms of which the defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Perry v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Sulpho-Saline Bath Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Wilson Sewing Machine Co. v. MorenoUnited States Circuit Court · 1879
  4. Tropp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Buchholz-Hill Transportation Co. v. BaxterNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API