Legal Opinion
State v. Hood
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided September 11, 1989No. 61,973PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Miller, C.J.:
This is a direct appeal by the defendant, Kenneth W. Hood, from an order of the trial court finding that the State exercised its peremptory challenges to remove the only two black jurors for “reasons that are neutral and are acceptable under the Batson decision.” See Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69, 106 S. Ct. 1712 (1986). The order from which defendant appeals was entered at a hearing in the trial court directed by this court in the earlier appeal in this case, State v. Hood, 242 Kan. 115, 744 P.2d 816 (1987). Two issues…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Ella Louise Forbes and Lillie Mae BerryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Clyde Major Thompson, AKA Clyde JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Yarborough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. KingsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- State v. ButlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- State v. Ngan PhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.