Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robinson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 17, 2005No. Record 2474-03-2, 2539-03-2Published

1DissentAnnunziata, Judge

I concur in the majority’s finding that Officer Cox entered the curtilage of the Robinson residence and that he conducted the challenged search from that vantage point. I write separately, however, because I do not agree that the search can be found constitutionally proper on the theory that the Robinsons had impliedly invited Officer Cox’s entry, thereby extinguishing any reasonable expectation of privacy they had in the curtilage. Cox’s sole and undisputed purpose for entering the curtilage was to search for criminal activity. Consistent with the guarantees of the United States…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Maryland v. MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API