Legal Opinion
Botens v. Aronauer
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. O’Gorman, J.
This is a renewal of a motion for summary judgment in an action in which the plaintiffs seek to have declared invalid a county tax deed issued to the defendant, and to declare the plaintiffs still to be the owners of the property.
The defendant counterclaims for judgment declaring him to be the owner.
The facts, as developed by prior proceedings herein, are as follows :
In 1946 the plaintiff Reinhold and the late Francis P. Botens purchased a vacant tract in the Town of Wallkill, Orange County, and thereafter paid the real property taxes assessed thereon until the year 1961. In this year the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States Tr. Co. of New York v. . U.S. Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
- City of New Rochelle v. Echo Bay Waterfront Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- People Ex Rel. Republican & Journal Co. v. WigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Botens v. AronauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1986
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1980