Legal Opinion

State v. Loftin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 20, 2008No. C053471CR; A132948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of one count of second-degree robbery, ORS 164.405, and one count of second-degree assault, ORS 163.175. On appeal, defendant raises a preserved contention that, under the rationale of Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), the sentencing court erred in imposing sentences that were partially consecutive to each other on those convictions, based on the court’s finding made pursuant to ORS 137.123(5)(a). After the parties briefed this case, but before oral argument, the Oregon Supreme Court decided State v. Ice, 343 Or 248, 170 P3d 1049…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. Tuan Anh NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. FernaaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. KarpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. LoftinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API