Stoltz v. People

*344Stoltz was convicted of obtaining a bank check of the valuó of $200 from one Bates, by false and fraudulent pretenses, and prosecutes this writ of error to the judgment entered upon the verdict.

Plaintiff in error insists that the judgment should be reversed for the following reasonsthat the facts as set forth in the information constitute no offense under the law; that the court refused to give to the jury proper instructions requested, and gave improper instructions to defendant’s prejudice; and that the evidence was wholly insufficient to sustain the verdict of conviction.

1. The information…