Legal Opinion

State v. Brantingham

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1923No. 5,197PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

The defendant was charged with having obtained $500 from Mrs. Annie C. Mitchell by false representations and pretenses. Upon the trial, at the conclusion of the state’s case, the defendant moved the court to dismiss the information and discharge him upon the ground, among others, that the evidence failed to establish the offense charged, or any offense. The motion was overruled, and defendant rested without offering testimony. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and judgment was entered thereon. From that judgment the appeal is prosecuted. The evidence is presented in a bill of exceptions,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. . DimickNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ball v. GussenhovenMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State v. BrattonMontana Supreme Court · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. TiedemannMontana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. RobinsonMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Clifton, Applegate & Toole v. Big Lake Drain District No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Steven v. Potlatch Oil & Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API