Price v. Rogers Enterprises
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ANSTEAD, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary final judgment holding that the appellant, a real estate broker, was not entitled to a commission from the appellees with reference to the appellant’s efforts to effect a sale of property owned by the appellees.
The parties entered into a written brokerage agreement pursuant to which the appel-lees would pay the appellant a fixed amount as a commission if the appellant effected a sale of appellees’ property upon terms and conditions agreeable to appellees. The commission was to be paid in installments out of the proceeds of the sale.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knowles v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Wiggins v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Livingston v. MaleverSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Hanover Realty Corp. v. CodomoSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Mark v. HahnSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lundstrom Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Di Gennaro v. Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- In re MicklerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1986