Marshall v. Burtis
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
This is a suit to quiet title to a lot in the city of Phoenix, Arizona, described as lot 8 in block 1 in Neahr’s addition to said city. The appellee was plaintiff in the court below and the appellant was defendant, and we shall so designate them.
The plaintiff alleged that he was in possession as owner in fee, deriving it from one Friday Neahr, commonly known as Mary F. Neahr, an unmarried woman, over twrenty-one years of age, by a deed dated October 14, 1892. That the defendant, contriving to defraud him (the plaintiff) and cloud his title to the property, induced said Friday Neahr, by false…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Idaho & Oregon Land Improvement Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Lucas v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Gildersleeve v. New Mexico Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- San Pedro & Cañon Del Agua Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thompson v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Cohn v. DaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899