Thompson v. Ferry
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice :
This appeal being from the judgment of a territorial court, and no errors having been assigned on exceptions to rulings on the admission or rejection of testimony, we are limited in our review to the determination of the question whether the facts found are sufficient to sustain the judgment rendered. Gildersleeve v. New Mexico Mining Company, 161 U. S. 573; Harrison v. Perea, 168 U. S. 311; Marshall v. Burtis, 172 U. S. 630.
The opinion of the trial court sets forth facts on which it proceeds, but there are no specific findings as such.
In the Supreme Court the statement of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harrison v. PereaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Gildersleeve v. New Mexico Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Marshall v. BurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- M. W. Loveless, Dba Loveless Manufacturing Company, a Sole Proprietorship v. Universal Carloading & Distributing Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Rosaly v. Graham Y FrazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Gonzales v. BuistSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- M. W. Loveless, Dba Loveless Manufacturing Company, a Sole Proprietorship v. Universal Carloading & Distributing Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955