Legal Opinion

Gordy v. Sumner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1979No. 57874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

In this case before us by interlocutory review, the trial court granted appellants’ motion to add appellee Robert L. Sumner as a party to their action, originally brought against Brady Sumner and Cecil Kimble. Although the permitted amendment to the complaint, with summons attached, was served upon appellee, there was no court order requiring appellee to file an answer. Contrary to appellants’ contentions, it follows that appellee was never in default and that the court properly allowed appellee to appear and defend. Diaz v. First Nat. Bank, 144 Ga. App. 582 (2) (241 SE2d 467)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Diaz v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chan v. W-East Trading Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Sondi Moore-Waters v. Met-Test, LLC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. Random Access, Inc. v. Atlanta Datacom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Hamelberg v. National Ass'n of Government EmployeesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API