Legal Opinion

Chan v. W-East Trading Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1991No. A91A0049PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

This court granted appellant’s application for discretionary appeal on the issue of whether appellant, as an additional party defendant, is required to answer plaintiff’s second amended complaint when the consent order adding the appellant as an additional party defendant did not require applicant to file an answer.

Appellee W-East Trading Corporation brought a suit on account against Cháñese, Inc. d/b/a Chan & Chan Market. Appellant Herbert C. Chan was the president of the corporation at all times relevant to this action. During the course of the relatively stormy…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. West v. NodvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Norris v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Gully v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Armech Service Co. v. Rose Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Benefield v. BenefieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Shields v. GishSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. MOM CORP. v. Chattahoochee BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Jackson v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Hap Farms, Inc. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Baez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API