Legal Opinion

Carruth Mortgage Corp. v. Ford

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 25, 1982No. 01-81-0749-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying recovery on a promissory note and guaranty agreement. The trial was to a jury which found that the appellant should take nothing on its cause of action for deficiency on the note amount, and made negative findings on appellees’ affirmative defense of promissory estoppel and cross-action for fraud. Before submission of the case to the jury, the trial court granted appellees’ motion for directed verdict on appellees’ claim that the appellant’s cause of action for fraud was barred by the statute of limitations.

The record reflects that on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ruebeck v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Wise v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Adams v. SlatteryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Williams v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Chrysler First Business Credit Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. Long v. NCNB-Texas National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Royal Park No. 14, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Helen M. Collins v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  5. Charles R. Tips Family Trust, Hazel W. Tips Family Trust and Charles T. Watkins v. PB Commercial LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API