Legal Opinion

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Conrad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1987No. Civ. 11351Published

1Opinion of the Court

410 N.W.2d 124 (1987)

AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee,

v.

Kent CONRAD, Tax Commissioner of the State of North Dakota, Defendant, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant.

Civ. No. 11351.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

June 30, 1987.

Thompson & Knight, Dallas, Tex., and Fleck, Mather, Strutz & Mayer, Bismarck, and David Castro, Amerada Hess Corp., Tulsa, Okl., for plaintiff, appellant, and cross-appellee; Jane Fleck Romanov (argued).

Tobyn J. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., North Dakota State Tax Dept., Bismarck, for defendant, appellee, and cross-appellant.

LE…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Feldman v. GrangerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API