Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Hawaii Culinary Corp.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1997No. 20469PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACOBA, Judge.

We hold that in its January 14, 1997 amended judgment, the district court of the third circuit (the court) correctly determined that Defendants-Appellants Hawaii Culinary Corporation and Stanley Monsef (Monsef) were liable to pay additional rent to Plaintiff-Appellee Michelle Forbes (Forbes), the landlord of the subject commercial premises. However, the case must be remanded because, in addition to inconsistent statements in the judgment concerning the back rent and attorneys’ fees awarded Forbes, the court must confirm that any attorneys’ fees awarded under Hawaii Revised…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lemle v. BreedenHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  5. AIG Hawaii Insurance v. Estate of CaraangHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Price v. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Casumpang v. ILWU LOCAL 142Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Sheehan v. Centex HomesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
  5. BARNEDO v. DominguezHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API