Legal Opinion
Mortenson v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 17, 1989No. CX-89-485PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Petitioner State of Minnesota challenges the trial court’s decision to order a jury trial to establish the appraised current market value of an easement the Commission of Transportation seeks to convey to the owner of the underlying fee. Because Minn.Stat. § 161.43 neither éxpressly nor impliedly requires a jury trial to determine appraised current market value, we reverse.
FACTS
In 1942, petitioner acquired an easement over the property involved in this case in an eminent domain proceeding. The purchase price was $17,250. The easement was purchased for use in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ferrell v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993