United States v. Romero
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Carl Romero was convicted by a jury of assaulting and killing Naay-aitch Friday. He challenges the district court’s refusal to suppress evidence found after searches of the car he drove and his bedroom. We hold that the search warrant for the car was supported by probable cause and that investigating officers properly relied on his stepfather’s consent to search his bedroom. Exercising jurisdic tion under 12 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm the district court’s denial of his motions to suppress.
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Friday’s body was found in an arroyo off a dirt road on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Maurice Whitfield, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. DanhauerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Mesa RithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Patel v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. GuillenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- State v. BoggessSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- United States v. AlabiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Douglas Craig Lemley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.