Monetaire Mining Co. v. Columbus Rexall Consol. Mines Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon. P. C. Hvans, Judge. Action by the Monetaire Mining Company against the Columbus Rexall Consolidated Mines Company and others. ' Judgment for defendant named. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.
The plaintiff, hereinafter called appellant, commenced this action against the Columbus Extension Mining Company, the Rexall Silver & Copper Mining Company, the Columbus Rex-all Consolidated Mines Company, and Alexander H. Cowie to condemn a right to use a certain mining tunnel in common with the defendant the Columbus Rexall Consolidated Mines Company, a corporation, hereinafter, designated respondent. The defendants other than the respondent, for reasons appearing in the record, may be excluded from consideration on this appeal, and we shall not refer to them again.
The complaint is very…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
- Nash v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1904
- Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake City Water & Electrical Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1902
- Tanner v. Provo Bench Canal & Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1911
- Salt Lake City v. East Jordan Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Utah State Road Commission v. FribergUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Wrightsman v. Southwestern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Schroeder Investments, L.C. v. EdwardsUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Baker v. Hatch, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.